Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 26, 2025
Accepted
Aug 1, 2025
Published
Aug 1, 2025
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 3 Download : 2

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess how satisfied Tulungagung University students are
with the services provided by the Academic Information System (SIAKAD). The evaluation
was conducted by analysing students' perceptions of system quality, information quality,
and service quality provided by SIAKAD. In this study, a quantitative method was applied,
in which data were obtained through the distribution of questionnaires to Tulungagung
University students as the main source of information. The results showed that SIAKAD
provides easy access to academic information for students, but there are still some obstacles
such as access difficulties at certain times. In general, the level of student satisfaction with
SIAKAD is in the satisfied category, but improvement is needed in service aspects and
development of system features to increase user satisfaction in the future. This finding is
expected to be an input for the management of Tulungagung University in an effort to
develop a more interactive academic information system

Keywords

Academic Information System, student satisfaction level, service evaluation, system quality, information quality

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Anggraini Ningsih, A. N. (2025). E EVALUASI TINGKAT KEPUASAN MAHASISWA TERHADAP LAYANAN SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK ATAU SIAKAD DALAM UNIVERSITAS TULUNGAGUNG. JIMBIEN : JURNAL MAHASISWA MANAJEMEN, BISNIS, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 4(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.36563/jimbien.v4i1.1604

References

  1. Adyanata, I. K., Nugraha, P. A. G., Gunawan, I. M. A. O., & Indrawan, G. (2024). Evaluasi
  2. Sistem Informasi SIAkad UPMI Mengunakan Metode System Usability Scale.
  3. JUPITER: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Dan Teknologi Komputer, 16(1), 61–70.
  4. Cahyoadi, B., & Loisa, G. B. (2019). Pengaruh Kinerja Sistem Informasi Akademik
  5. (SIAKAD) Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Untuk Meningkatkan Loyalitas Dengan
  6. Pencitraan Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi pada Mahasiswa STKIP PGRI
  7. Tulungagung). Indonesian Journal of Strategic Management, 2(2).
  8. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijsm.v2i2.1969
  9. Institut, I., & Batam, T. (2023). Jurnal siteba. I(2), 28–39.
  10. Jannah, K. A. M., Aiman, U., Hasda, S., Fadilla, Z., Ardiawan, T. M. K. N., & Sari, M. E.
  11. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. In
  12. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (Issue May).
  13. Kartini, A., Sanmorino, A., & Terttiavini. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa
  14. Terhadap Sistem Informasi Akademik Stebis Igm Menggunakan Metode Pieces
  15. Framework. AnoaTIK: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer, 2(1), 51–59.
  16. https://doi.org/10.33772/anoatik.v2i1.21
  17. Kristiana, O. (2022). Analisis Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Pada Sistem Informasi
  18. Akademik (SIAKAD) Menggunakan Framework Cobit 2019 (Studi Kasus STMIK
  19. Pringsewu). Analisis Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi …………………….……, 11, 11–
  20. 21.
  21. Maulida, N. M., Prastya, S. E., Hidayat, A., & Pratama, R. N. (2024). Evaluasi Kepuasan
  22. Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akademik ( SIAKAD ) Universitas Sari Mulia Banjarmasin
  23. Menggunakan Metode End User Computing Satisfaction ( EUCS ). 7(5), 1012–1020.
  24. Mustofa. (2015). Metode Penelitian dengan NPF dan Roa. Jurnal, 1–9.
  25. Nuzulia, A. (2023). Pengaruh Beban Kerja, Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Turnover Intention.
  26. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24.
  27. Pondaag L, A., Katili, R. M., & Zakaria, A. (2023). Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akademik (
  28. Siakad ) Menggunakan Metode End User Computing Satisfaction ( Eucs ). Jurnal of
  29. System and Information Technology, 3(2), 1–10.
  30. Prabowo, R. G. M. (2016). Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Terhadap Pelayanan Kantor Desa
  31. Bandung Kabupaten Tulungagung. Jurnal Benefit, 3(1), 1–18.
  32. Prabowo, R. G. M. (2022). Sistem Informasi Manajemen.
  33. Soetedjo, F. A., Gustian, D., Studi, P., Informasi, S., & Putra, U. N. (2022). Kepuasan
  34. mahasiswa sistem informasi universitas xyz terhadap layanan siakad. 1–7.
  35. Sulaeman, H., Utomo, H. P., & Suryana, A. I. (2023). Penilaian Risiko Keamanan Informasi
  36. Pada Sistem Informasi Akademik (Siakad) Dengan Menggunakan Framework Nist-Sp
  37. 800 30. Naratif : Jurnal Nasional Riset, Aplikasi Dan Teknik Informatika, 5(2), 171–
  38. 185. https://doi.org/10.53580/naratif.v5i2.254
  39. Susetyo, D. P., Pranajaya, E., Setiawan, T., & Suryana, A. (2022). Kualitas Pelayanan
  40. Akademik dan Citra Institusi sebagai Determinan Kepuasan Mahasiswa. Formosa
  41. Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v1i4.1250
  42. Ulum, H. M. (2016). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas. Buku Uji Validitas Dan Uji Reliabilitas,
  43. 67.