DETERMINANTS OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION INTENTION IN PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF KUTAI KARTANEGARA REGENCY

Authors

  • Muhammad Adib Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Rifqi Muhammad Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36563/ajdm0k52

Keywords:

Blockchain, Adoption Intention, Diffusion of Innovations, Public Finance, Local Government

Abstract

Public financial management at the regional level still faces challenges in transparency and accountability. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing the intention to adopt Blockchain technology in public financial management within the Kutai Kartanegara Regency Government. Employing a quantitative approach with a survey method, data were gathered from 62 State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in BPKAD, Bapenda, and the Regional Inspectorate using a purposive sampling technique. Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that the model has strong explanatory power (R2 = 0.762) and good predictive relevance (Q2 = 0.503). Partially, Stakeholders and Competency are proven to have a significant positive influence on Blockchain adoption intention. Conversely, Relative Advantage, Complexity, Laws and Regulations, and Top Management Support show no significant effect. Theoretically, this study shows that human resource capacity and external stakeholder support are more dominant than technological characteristics at the early stage of innovation diffusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Antara News. (2024). Realisasi pendapatan APBD Kutai Kartanegara 2024 capai Rp 5,8 triliun.

Cagigas, D., Clifton, J., D’iaz-Fuentes, D., & Fernández-Gutiérrez, M. (2021). Blockchain for public services: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9, 13904–13927. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050799

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (Vol. 295, Issue 2, pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Dong, S., Abbas, K., Li, M., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2023). Blockchain technology and application: An overview. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1705. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1705

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., & Lal, B. (2022). Understanding the impact of digital transformation on public sector performance: The mediating role of organizational capability. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102460

Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ibrahimy, M. M., Norta, A., & Normak, P. (2023). Blockchain-based governance models supporting corruption-transparency: A systematic literature review. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 5(2), 100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2023.100186

Ifinedo, P. (2011). Internet/e-business technologies acceptance in Canada’s SMEs: An exploratory investigation. Internet Research, 21(3), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111139309

Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analyzing Blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, technical, and organizational perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.023

Kouhizadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains. Sustainability, 10(10), 3652. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103652

Maolani, D. Y. (2024). Enhancing public service delivery through Blockchain technology: A novel approach to transparent and efficient governance. VISIONER, 16(1), 12–21.

Nguyen, T. H., Ngo, L. V, Ruël, H., & van der Heijden, B. (2022). Top management support and digital transformation: The mediating roles of change readiness and innovation capability. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101684

Noman, E. P., & Gwenhure, A. K. (2025). Factors influencing the diffusion of Blockchain technology in the Indonesian government. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 11(2), 123–135.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. (2024). Laporan realisasi Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Tahun Anggaran 2024. https://ppid.kukarkab.go.id/download/berkala/3696

Rai, A., & Al-Ghamdi, S. (2022). Social influences on technology adoption: The role of visibility and demonstrability of results. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121588

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Shareef, M. A., Archer, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Examining public sector adoption of emerging technologies: The role of perceived benefits and institutional pressures. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4), 1029–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10053-3

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sun, S., Kuang, L., & Ma, H. (2021). Blockchain adoption in public administration: The role of leadership, organizational capacity, and institutional pressure. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(5), 1341–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10054-z

Susanti, D., Purwanto, A., & Santoso, A. (2023). Digital literacy, employee capability, and technology adoption in local governments. Information Development, 39(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211067123

Tabatabaei, M. H., Ytreberg, R., & Veraraghavan, N. R. (2023). Understanding Blockchain: Definitions, architecture, design, and system comparison. ArXiv Preprint, arXiv:2207.02264. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.02264

Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2021). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625

Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.

Toufaily, E., Zalan, T., & Dhaou, S. B. (2021). A framework of Blockchain technology adoption: An investigation of challenges and expected value. Information & Management, 58(2), 103444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103444

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Zhao, Z., Fan, X., Yan, J., & Zhang, X. (2022). Regulatory support and digital innovation adoption in public sector organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3), 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10157-4

Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of Blockchain for government services: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /var/www/html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.php on line 68

How to Cite

DETERMINANTS OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION INTENTION IN PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF KUTAI KARTANEGARA REGENCY. (2026). JAT : Journal Of Accounting and Tax , 5(2), 839-858. https://doi.org/10.36563/ajdm0k52