Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the legal power of a building lease agreement without a written agreement based on it and the implementation of a building lease agreement in accordance with Article 1320 in conjunction with Article 1548 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The method and technique used in research to collect data through observation, interviews, and documentation is known as qualitative descriptive. Using the observation method, researchers obtain data about the actual condition of the rented building and the surrounding environment. The documentation method itself seeks data and conditions related to the object of research. The interview method is used to obtain direct information from sources to find out about the issues discussed in the study. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the legal force regarding the building lease agreement without the basis of a written agreement and the implementation of the building lease agreement is related to the education and implementation of the agreement on leasing so that it is not against the law between the lessee and the lessee.

Keywords

Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Legal Strength Agreement Leasing

Article Details

How to Cite
oki yunice, Andreas Andrie Djatmiko, & Ajar Dirgantoro. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Bangunan Tanpa Dasar Perjanjian Tertulis Ditinjau Pasal 1320 Jo Pasal 1548 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Yustitiabelen, 9(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v9i2.556

References

  1. Abdullah, Z. 2010. Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Syarat Sah Dan Unsur-Unsur Dalam Suatu Perjanjian. Jurnal Lex Specialis, (11): 20–25.
  2. Ana, D. & Hanim, L. 2021. Penerapan Asas Konsensualisme Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Rumah Application Of The Principle Of Consensualism In House Renting Agreements. 267–279.
  3. Arsawan, I.G.Y. 2019. FORCE MAJEURE DALAM AKTA SEWA MENYEWA ( STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PALU NOMOR : 23 / PDT . G . S / 2019 / PN PAL ).
  4. Indonesia, U.H.P., Andrie, A., Setyaningrum, F. & Zainudin, R. 2021. Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Implementasi Bentuk Ganti Rugi Menurut Burgelijk Wetboek ( Kitab. 1(7): 1–10.
  5. Perlu, H.Y., Oleh, D., Dalam, N. & Hanapiah, Y. 2018. Hal-Hal Yang Perlu Diperhatikan Oleh Notaris Dalam Membuat... (Yogi Hanapiah) Vol 5 No 1 Januari 2018. 5(1): 112–116.
  6. Purnayasa, A.T. 2019. Akibat Hukum Terdegradasinya Akta Notaris yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat Pembuatan Akta Autentik. Acta Comitas, 3(3): 395.
  7. Sciences, H. 2016. Tanggung Jawab Hukum Terhadap Proses Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Rumah Toko (Ruko). 4(1): 1–23.
  8. Sinaga, N.A. 2018. PERANAN ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PERJANJIAN DALAM. 7(2): 107–120.
  9. Tjoanda, M. 2010. Wujud Ganti Rugi Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Sasi, 16(4): 43–50.
  10. Yuniarlin, W.Y.L.& P. 2020. Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Dibawah Tangan yang Didaftarkan (Waarmerken) di Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 07/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Slmn ). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Undergraduate Conference, 2020(2015): 599–608.
  11. Peraturan
  12. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 293, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5602
  13. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004
  14. Wawancara
  15. Andrea Andrei Djatmiko, Wawancara, Pakar Hukum
  16. R.Soebolo, Wawancara, Pakar Hukum